 The REAL Napster says: All you "There were no WMD in Iraq" types need to do better homework. This was not hard info to find. Make sure you read all the Googled links at the bottom of the page as well that all show the common destinations for Iraqs WMD that 'never existed' Supposedly, the story is that the WMD stockpile was hastily removed to Syria(and other locations). The problem with the WMD is that they were U.S. manufacture supplied to Iraq during the Iran/Iraq war. This is quite the 'oops' for the U.S. as foreign nations have their hands on U.S. made weapons complete with serial numbers. Would be quite difficult to explain for instance if some were used against certain targets or cities and they had the U.S. markings all over them. We read about this while the coalition forces were moving in!!! There were satellite photos showing convoys and people *saying* this was happening!! With all we know about the intrigue and maneuvers going on in the ME, why would we doubt this? And we *know* Iran has WMDs! A senior Syrian journalist reports Iraq WMD located in three Syrian sitesThe date of this story may explain a lot. I sure no clipper would deliberately mislead us with this 2.5 year old yarn??? I thought George was the only dodo who still believed the lie about WMDs in Iraq. 116 22 Feb 2007 Hell, I bet I could find an Irishman who could vouch that we have them . Or maybe the Canadians have them. No the Brits took them and hid them for the laugh. Or maybe they are in an American scrapyard somewhere. Is it naiveté or stupidity that distinguishes some of our clippers of a certain persuasion, whose size is thankfully diminishing daily? Even they can see now that Bush has no clothes! Or are the frightened fools trying to fool the rest of us with their expectation of nothing but the worst case scenario that suits their crooked view of life. That while a lot of them believe in god! No logic, no sense. Is it naiveté or stupidity that distinguishes some of our clippers of a certain persuasion, whose size is thankfully diminishing daily? Even they can see now that Bush has no clothes!Good question, but it doesn't pertain to the clip- It's about the credibility of a Syrian man who risked his life to expose what people don't want him to. Your particular viewpoint while different, has no bearing or ability to change the outcome. Please read mine of Aug 04 2007 8.07 am. Please try a keep with what is going on in the comments. You can appear very foolish when you just drop in and out and are unable to comprehend the current position. It would be appreciated that we not have to answer twice. Just this time... A senior Syrian journalist reports Iraq WMD located in three Syrian sitesThe date of this story may explain a lot. I sure no clipper would deliberately mislead us with this 2.5 year old yarn??? I thought George was the only dodo who still believed the lie about WMDs in Iraq. 116 22 Feb 2007 To the deniers who have never heard this before, its not a new theory.There are satellite photos in the final hours before or right at the opening of the bombing of Baghdad that showed a caravan of military style vehicles at the Syrian border.Other stories of lines of suspiciously equipped vehicles,some accompanied by limos of Russian diplomats rolling over the border into Syria were ignored by any news agencies or media of the mainstream and definitely by the radical left. Listeners to the old John Batchelor Show and John Loftus knew there were more than a faint rumor. Admittedly nothing was verified publicly but neither were there any investigations or any common discussion. The area of in... Yeah, and the U.S. also had satellite pics of mobile bio labs. Credibility on this issue....0 Boy this is some old garbage. HA! Good one ratilfar. Yeah, and the U.S. also had satellite pics of mobile bio labs. Credibility on this issue....0True in that regard. I did have a link to the convoy pics headed to Syria and will locate and post it again. My apologies for not being more thorough. Even if you presented such pics, those trucks could be loaded with anything, from former Baathist to weapons ,cash, records of Saddam security forces (those are the first ones used against the former regime) or potential WMDs. Saddam's sons made a run for Syria and where turned back. Satellites can not (as far as I know) detect minute traces of chemicals or radiation from orbit (especially if properly shielded). And Syria is rumored to have its own WMD capability (in the form of chemical agents) so unless Saddam's cronies where packing enough materials for one or two nukes its a moot point. And even if they did, Syria would probably grab them for themselves, after all they have a nuclear ... You're right ratiflar - those trucks could be loaded with anything, including WMDs, although somehow you failed to mention that as an option. And yes, that nuclear opponent of Syria... boy, hard to figure out what they're waiting for... they've had the nukes for years and reading into your description of them - they should've annihilated Syria long time ago... doesn't quite compute there... I did not say that the Israelis where going to use nukes, but if a guy sitting across the border has nukes and you don't thats would encourage anybody to get them, just in case (basic tenet of nuclear politics). As for the WMDs, this is what I said.... those trucks could be loaded with anything, from former Baathist to weapons ,cash, records of Saddam security forces (those are the first ones used against the former regime) or potential WMDs. Oh and the above is meant only as a clarification, not an attempt to belabor the point. You're right ratiflar - those trucks could be loaded with anything, including WMDs, although somehow you failed to mention that as an option. And yes, that nuclear opponent of Syria... boy, hard to figure out what they're waiting for... they've had the nukes for years and reading into your description of them - they should've annihilated Syria long time ago... doesn't quite compute there... Ok then I guess I have no choice but to belabor the point. I never described Israel nuclear policy as preemptive (their conventional policy on the other hand is). I am sure that any Israeli PM would have considered the aftermath any nuclear strike, including radiation drifting down to Israel and contamination of its water supplies. I mean, Israel has nuclear weapons, and multiple platforms to deliver them including but not limited to, SRBM/IRBM, F-16C fighter bombers, and tomahawk missiles launched from their diesel powered submarine fleet. For the record, I am not suggesting, nor have I ever suggested that its either the policy of the State of Israel or any of the branches of the IDF ... You stated... And even if they did, Syria would probably grab them for themselves,Your implication is that Syria would grab them because of their nuclear opponent. My point is that the fact that they're nuclear is irrelevant, because Israel wouldn't attack unless provoked. So, all Syria has to do is NOT provoke to avoid any issues, not reach for nukes themselves. My point is that the fact that they're nuclear is irrelevant, because Israel wouldn't attack unless provoked.Is this worthy of reply? Just list the Pearl Harbour style attacks by Israel. Who could/would trust Israel? "...unless provoked" the get out of jail card that justifies everything and anything. I'm confused ... if this really is strong evidence that former Iraqi WMDs are now hidden in Syria, and if, as TRN says, "this is not hard information to find," then how come no one in the Bush administration has mentioned it publicly? Up to now they've been pretty eager to show evidence that the WMD rationale for the invasion was solid. I totally concur with you enbar... it makes no sense. But neither do reports that 'bin laden is around the border of Afghanistan & Pakistan'... although since we don't have the details, hard to know what's actually going on. I'm confused ... if this really is strong evidence that former Iraqi WMDs are now hidden in Syria, and if, as TRN says, "this is not hard information to find," then how come no one in the Bush administration has mentioned it publicly?Good point and it actually raises the crux of the problem. Reportedly the very WMD's we seek are U.S. made with U.S. markings & serials all over them. During the Iran/Iraq war the U.S. clandestinely 'sold' some weapons to Iraq to use against Iran they should not have. Saddam prized these as he knew his neighbors couldn't get thier hands on them. In a classic case of the dog turning on it's owner, Saddam got power hungry and went after Kuwait... |
View the Top Clips from July 8, 2007
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
